Abstract: Intraoperative Comparison of Round vs. Anatomical Implants in Primary Breast Augmentation

Background: Nipple-areola and skin sparing mastectomy (NASSM) is an accepted and sought after option for eligible patients, and the rate of women undergoing this operation continues to climb. The main advantage of the procedure is the ability utilize existing skin envelope and NAC for improved shape, fewer operations, and less psychological impact on patients. There are many possible incisions, each providing its own advantage from an oncologic or reconstructive perspective. Studies suggest that perfusion is received primarily from superior, medial, and lateral contributions. Therefore the lateral radial (LR) incision may lead to improved perfusion, however the mastectomy is more difficult via an inframammary (IMF) incision and this could lead to a higher complication rate. We aim to assess perfusion to nipple-areola complex in these two incision patterns and determine the impact of the incision type on overall outcomes, complications, and patient satisfaction.